The CXO Codex

How do you use AI to create better work, not simply faster work?

A practical chapter from The CXO Codex, built in conversation with CX expert, Lorena Lovric.

About the expert

Portrait of Lorena Lovric
Lauren Miles, host of CXO Loading
Lauren Miles
Host, CXO Loading...

Lorena Lovric

Director of Customer Experience

Lorena Lovric is an award-winning Director of Customer Experience whose work connects AI transformation, agent experience, and customer outcomes. Her agent-first approach starts with the work people do today, not a technology promise in isolation.

She is clear that automation can remove repetitive tasks, but it cannot substitute for judgement, culture, or the difficult human conversation that makes a customer feel understood.

Listen Now

Placeholder for Apple Podcast iframe. We're going LIVE next week.

The learning

AI can automate tasks. It cannot create culture.

AI has made it easy to talk about speed. The more useful question for a CX leader is what the organisation will do with the time it gets back. If automation removes a repetitive task, will the team gain more room for judgement, coaching, and better customer conversations , or will a fragile process simply move faster?

Lorena Lovric’s agent-first perspective gives this chapter its test. AI can automate tasks. It cannot create culture, make a difficult commercial trade-off, or tell a customer that the organisation has genuinely understood what has gone wrong. Those remain leadership choices, designed into the operating model before the technology goes live.

AI can automate tasks. It cannot create culture.

Map the process before automating it. Do not scale confusion.

Decide explicitly what your team will do with the time automation returns to them.

Measure employee experience as seriously as customer experience , culture is operational, not decorative.

Clean up your house before you bring in a Roomba , otherwise it only drags the mess around faster.

Lorena Lovric, Director of Customer Experience

What research adds

The pattern is bigger than one good story.

The Codex reading of Lorena’s agent-first approach is that AI value is created in the design around the tool: the process that is ready to automate, the judgement that must remain human, the guardrails that make escalation safe, and the work leaders deliberately give back to people when time is returned.

A faster service flow is not automatically a better experience. The more useful investment case holds two outcomes together: what improved for the customer and what higher-quality work became possible for the team. If neither can be named before implementation, the organisation may be automating activity rather than improving the system.

Make it actionable

Use The Pre-AI House Check to make the idea real.

Use the Pre-AI House Check before selecting a solution for one service workflow. Make the current work visible, define the exact task you want AI to remove, and decide where judgement, escalation, and the time returned to people will go instead.

The leadership tension

Automation does not arrive in a neutral system. It amplifies the hand-offs, data gaps, unclear ownership, and service habits already underneath. That is why a tool that looks efficient in isolation can make the experience worse at scale: it can remove the moment where someone would otherwise notice that the process is broken.

A human-centred AI decision therefore needs two measures of value. The first is customer value: did the interaction become easier, clearer, or more reliably resolved? The second is human value: did the time returned make room for higher-quality work, or did it simply create a new expectation to do more with less?

Team tool

The Pre-AI House Check

Before automating, make the current work visible and decide what the newly available human time is for.

Map the current hand-offs and name the exact task AI is meant to remove , not a vague ambition to ‘use AI’.

Identify the broken workflow, data gap, unclear decision, or risk that automation could otherwise scale.

Define escalation and quality guardrails, then protect the time AI returns for coaching, judgement, or higher-value problem-solving.

Your next move

Day 1

Choose one repetitive customer-facing task and ask your team: if this disappeared tomorrow, what higher-value customer work would we choose to do with the time?

Build it in 30 days

Run a small AI readiness review for one service workflow: define the customer outcome, process/data readiness, human hand-off, guardrails, and the work reinvestment plan before selecting a solution.

Measure the shift

Track the customer outcome and the human outcome together: resolution quality, repeat contact or transfer rate, agent time returned, and how that time was reinvested.

How this creates movement from Director to CXO

You are building more than a good idea.

The move from Director to CXO is not only about spotting the experience issue. It is about creating a repeatable route from evidence to an accountable decision. The Pre-AI House Check gives you a practical way to make that route visible; Track the customer outcome and the human outcome together: resolution quality, repeat contact or transfer rate, agent time returned, and how that time was reinvested. Make agent experience and customer experience part of the same AI investment case , culture is operational, not decorative.

Additional resources

Keep the useful bits close.

Select one or more filters and keep only the inputs that sharpen the next decision you need to make.

Select one or more filters

Save & Share

A printable version of this material, built around the same practical question, research, tool, and next move.

Download guide

Continue the Codex

The next useful answer may sit in a different conversation.

Trust is the system

How do you make CX a business-wide leadership system, not a service function?

With Lara Khouri

Access now

The accounts that go quiet

How do you spot risk before customers complain, escalate, or leave?

With Abisola Fagbiye

Access now